Photos: How artists of the past imagined our present (and future)

ThatPainter is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Learn More

The artists who imagined our present and future were not consistently predicting inventions. They were translating the visible changes of their own age—balloons, electricity, telegraphs, steam power, aviation, and mass printing—into pictures of daily life. Their flying cities, mechanized classrooms, food pills, and domestic robots reveal how people understood progress, convenience, labor, and social change.

#	Preview	Product	Price
1		Futuredays: A Nineteenth Century Vision of the Year 2000	$64.67	Buy on Amazon
2		The Far Ends of Time and Earth (The Collected Fiction of Isaac Asimov ; V. 1)	$19.94	Buy on Amazon

Artists of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries did not see the future with supernatural accuracy. They built it out of the present: balloons became airships, telegraphs became instant information, electricity became a universal power source, and new machines were fitted into familiar social worlds. Their pictures are valuable less as forecasts than as records of what technological change felt like when it first became visible.

That is why an image of a flying bus, a mechanized classroom, or a domestic robot can seem uncannily modern and surprisingly strange at the same time. The broad function may resemble something we know, while the mechanism, social assumptions, and imagined consequences belong unmistakably to the period that produced it.

#1 Best Overall

Futuredays: A Nineteenth Century Vision of the Year 2000

• Used Book in Good Condition

$64.67

Buy on Amazon

Before technology made the future visible

People had imagined the future long before industrial modernity. In much Western religious art, the future was not a sequence of inventions but the end of earthly history: the Apocalypse, the Last Judgment, resurrection, punishment, or salvation. Mythological and literary traditions offered another model. Thomas More’s Utopia placed an ideal society beyond the known political world, while Jonathan Swift’s floating island of Laputa made advanced knowledge and impractical science into objects of satire.

These earlier visions matter because they show what changed in the nineteenth century. The future gradually moved from a distant religious event or an imaginary island into the streets, homes, schools, factories, and transport systems of ordinary life. Industrialization, electricity, mechanized production, imperial communication networks, aviation experiments, and cheap print made change appear possible within one human lifetime.

Speculation itself was not new. In 1661, Joseph Glanvill suggested that a journey to the Moon might eventually become as routine as a journey from Europe to America. He also imagined communication through “magnetic waves,” an idea that preceded the electric telegraph by nearly two centuries. Thomas Baldwin’s Airopedia, published in 1785, offered an early aerial view of the Earth. Such examples show that technological futurism had predecessors, but the nineteenth century gave those ideas a much larger audience and a richer visual vocabulary. The historical background is discussed in the source history of these images.

Balloons, electricity, and the invention of a technological future

The Montgolfier brothers’ first successful hot-air-balloon ascent in 1783 was a particularly important catalyst. Flight stopped being solely a myth or a dream and became a public demonstration. Writers such as Jules Verne and Edgar Allan Poe explored its literary possibilities, while illustrators began asking practical and comic questions: Would people commute through the sky? Could mail be delivered by air? Would cities need aerial traffic rules? Could a machine carry a family, a police officer, or a crowd of opera-goers?

Communication produced a similar effect. The telegraph compressed distance; newspapers accelerated the circulation of events; photography and lithography expanded the circulation of images; electricity promised to make information, light, heat, and entertainment available on demand. The future pictured by artists was therefore rarely an entirely new world. It was an enlarged version of the industrial city already around them.

Mass media made these private or professional speculations collective. Books, newspapers, illustrated magazines, advertisements, prints, postcards, and cards distributed through consumer products allowed people to look at the same imagined future. The Library of Congress guide to science through popular culture places this visual tradition within the broader history of science fiction and inexpensive popular media.

Albert Robida and the airborne city

French illustrator Albert Robida is one of the clearest examples of an artist imagining not merely a new machine but the infrastructure surrounding it. His future contains personal flying machines, passenger airships, aerial police patrols, airborne public transport, and floating leisure spaces such as casinos. In the image commonly identified as Leaving the Opera in the Year 2000, the familiar ritual of going home after a performance is transferred from the Parisian street to the sky.

Robida’s achievement is easy to underestimate if the image is treated as a simple “prediction” of flight. Airplanes did eventually become real, but the important question is what Robida assumed would happen once flight existed. He imagined it becoming part of urban routine, like a carriage, omnibus, or railway. Aircraft take on recognizable social forms: buses carry groups, limousines serve private passengers, and police vehicles patrol the city. The Library of Congress’s cataloged material on science and popular culture is useful for seeing how these machines were presented through the visual language of contemporary transport.

Robida also imagined the Téléphonoscope in The Twentieth Century: The Electrical Life. The device functions as a domestic screen for live entertainment, news, remote viewing, and shopping. Its resemblance to television, video calls, streaming media, and online retail is striking, but its underlying logic remains nineteenth-century. The future arrives through a large electrical apparatus in the home, and consumption, information, and spectacle are bundled together.

There is also congestion in Robida’s future. The sky is not an empty realm reserved for heroic explorers; it is a crowded extension of the city. This is an especially revealing detail. He understood that a new transport technology would not simply liberate people from old constraints. It would create routes, regulations, accidents, class distinctions, commercial services, and new forms of urban disorder.

William Heath: progress as joke and political argument

William Heath’s prints show that futurism could be skeptical from the beginning. His title The March of Intellect refers to the optimism associated with Robert Owen’s 1824 phrase, but Heath turns the promise of progress into a satirical procession. The imagined technologies include steam-powered horses, vacuum tunnels linking London and Bengal, and flying mail carriers.

These machines are not neutral symbols of human improvement. Heath’s print also contains class and ethnic prejudice, including caricatures of Irish immigrants. Its future therefore records competing attitudes toward modernization: excitement about speed and communication, mockery of grand technological promises, and anxiety about who will be moved, displaced, or admitted into the modern world.

That mixture is essential to reading historical futurism responsibly. An image can be inventive in its machinery and reactionary in its social imagination. Technological novelty does not automatically mean political progress.

Harry Grant Dart and the satirical home of the future

American illustrator Harry Grant Dart used futuristic imagery to make jokes about domestic life, labor, gender, and convenience. His 1908 comic The Explorigator sent children around the world in an airship. He also produced technological cartoons for Life and Judge, where the future became a stage for testing contemporary habits.

In We’ll All Be Happy Then, published in Life on December 7, 1911, comfort has been automated and packaged. Stored sunlight is available indoors. Fresh Alpine air is pumped into the home. Opera is delivered through a speaker, news is continuously recorded, and a robot-like servant attends to a man seated in a motorized armchair. Some of these details resemble later technologies: recorded news, domestic climate control, audio entertainment, and powered mobility. But the scene is not a technical blueprint. It is a comic exaggeration of the desire to eliminate effort from daily life.

Dart’s satire also asks who benefits from that convenience. The machine-filled home still has a social hierarchy: one person relaxes while another figure performs the work. The picture’s technological novelty does not erase labor; it relocates or disguises it.

His gender satire is even more revealing. In Why Not Go to the Limit?, women occupy bars and public leisure spaces while men are confined to a “Gentleman’s Parlour.” The image reverses familiar gender arrangements, but the reversal is framed through anxiety and humor. It tells us less about the actual future of women’s rights than about contemporary fears that changing rights and public behavior might overturn the established social order.

Dart’s work is therefore best described as speculative satire. It uses an imaginary future to expose the assumptions of the present. The machines attract attention, but the real subject is domestic dependence, social permission, and the fear of losing status.

Jean-Marc Côté and the commercial year 2000

The French images commonly known as En l’an 2000 are probably the most familiar examples of early twentieth-century futurism. Made around 1899–1900, with additional material dated 1901 and 1910, the series imagined daily life in the year 2000. The pictures included flying machines, aerial mail, automated tailoring, mechanized education, underwater farming, telescopes, air travel, and chemical substitutes for food.

The series is often called a set of postcards, but that description needs qualification. Research summaries indicate that the original images were paper cards enclosed in cigarette or cigar boxes and were later reproduced or circulated as postcards. Financial difficulties meant that they were not widely distributed at the time. Their later fame owes much to reproduction and retrospective publication, including Isaac Asimov’s 1986 book Futuredays: A Nineteenth-Century Vision of the Year 2000. The history of their production and circulation is summarized by 2084: Futuros Imaginados.

For readers who want a companion source focused on this series, Futuredays by Isaac Asimov is useful as a historical visual collection rather than a book that must be read before understanding the images. Availability and edition details can vary, so it is worth checking the specific listing before buying.

Flight as work, war, and leisure

Advance Sentinel in a Helicopter applies flight to military reconnaissance. The Rural Postman turns the mail carrier into a flying cyclist, while The Stirrup-Cup places an airship inside a social ritual of departure and drinking. The variety matters: flight is not limited to exploration. It is imagined as labor, surveillance, delivery, entertainment, and ordinary travel.

That pattern appears throughout early futurism. Once a new technology became imaginable, artists quickly asked how it might be absorbed into existing institutions. The result was not one future but a network of possible services built around a machine.

“At School”: information without the modern computer

In At School, books are mechanically processed and information is transmitted electrically to students’ headphones. To a modern viewer, the image can suggest digital learning, audiobooks, online courses, or educational streaming. Yet there is no need to claim that Côté predicted the internet. The picture retains the physical assumptions of its era: books must be fed into a machine, wires carry the knowledge, and students receive it through dedicated listening devices.

This is a good example of functional resemblance. The artist identifies a genuine possibility—information might be detached from the printed page and transmitted directly to a learner—without anticipating the actual architecture through which that possibility would later be realized.

Rank #2

The Far Ends of Time and Earth (The Collected Fiction of Isaac Asimov ; V. 1)

$19.94

Buy on Amazon

“A Chemical Dinner Party”: convenience taken to its limit

A Chemical Dinner Party reduces food to a small pill containing the presumed chemical essentials of a meal. The image is often remembered as a prediction of meal-replacement products, but its larger subject is industrial efficiency. Eating is treated as a problem of inputs and outputs: identify the necessary substances, compress them, and eliminate the time-consuming ritual of cooking and dining.

The fantasy is revealing precisely because it is incomplete. Food is not only fuel. It is pleasure, culture, hospitality, memory, and social time. The chemical dinner imagines a future in which those values have been subordinated to speed.

“Heating With Radium”: the optimism—and danger—of new science

Heating With Radium captures the period’s enthusiasm for recently discovered scientific phenomena. Radium appears as a miraculous domestic energy source, suitable for heating homes. The image now looks alarming because the health hazards of ionizing radiation were not yet understood in the way they are today.

This is one of the most historically useful “failures” in the series. It shows that a future image can accurately register excitement about a new discovery while being profoundly wrong about its safe applications. The error is not random. It reflects a culture that expected every important scientific discovery to become a practical household benefit.

Charles Dellschau and the private mythology of flight

Charles Dellschau expands the history beyond professional illustrators and commercial publishing. A retired butcher in Houston, Dellschau produced drawings, paintings, and collages of imaginary airships from about 1899 until shortly before his death. He made thousands of colorful, double-sided watercolors, often incorporating newspaper clippings about early aviation, and bound them into roughly a dozen notebooks.

The Philadelphia Museum of Art’s object record emphasizes the scale and material character of the notebooks. They are not isolated sketches of futuristic machines but a sustained visual archive. Diagrams, captions, clippings, decorative color, and invented technical details combine to give the airships the appearance of a documented aviation history.

The American Visionary Art Museum identifies Dellschau’s earliest known illustrated diary as dating to 1899 and records at least thirteen notebooks. His drawings are associated with the supposed Sonora Aero Club and a substance called “NB Gas.” Those names belong to Dellschau’s imaginative account or to later art-historical framing; they should not be presented as evidence that a real Sonora Aero Club or experimental gas existed. The museum’s artist biography and collection context are a useful guide to that distinction.

Dellschau’s later discovery—including stories about notebooks being discarded and salvaged—has become part of the work’s reception history. It should not be confused with evidence about the airships themselves. What matters artistically is the way he turned speculation into a private mythology: the imaginary machines received their own institutions, vocabulary, records, and continuity.

Unlike Côté’s commercial cards or Dart’s magazine cartoons, Dellschau’s notebooks were not primarily designed to persuade a mass audience. They show how technological fantasy can function as autobiography, invented science, personal memory, and world-building. His future is not simply a forecast of transport; it is a complete alternative archive.

Prediction, speculation, satire, or commercial fantasy?

Calling all of these images “predictions” flattens their differences. A more useful reading separates at least four modes:

The categories can overlap. A commercial image can contain a genuine technological insight; a satirical picture can accidentally resemble a later invention; a speculative notebook can borrow the visual authority of scientific documentation. The point is not to assign one permanent label but to ask what the image was trying to do.

Why the “wrong” predictions matter most

Retrofuturist images are often judged by a checklist: Did the artist get the helicopter right? Did the flying car arrive? Was the video screen a prediction of television? This approach rewards accidental resemblance and ignores the social imagination that made the picture interesting.

A more revealing question is: What did the artist assume would remain unchanged? The people in these images often retain the clothes, manners, class structures, gender roles, and commercial habits of the present. New machines are placed into old hierarchies. A flying postman still performs a familiar job. A mechanized classroom still has teachers and pupils. A robot servant may change the method of domestic labor without changing who expects to be served.

The failures are equally instructive. Radium heating reveals faith in scientific progress without an adequate understanding of risk. Food pills reveal an industrial preference for efficiency over ritual. Personal aircraft reveal the belief that every new mobility technology will become individually owned, even though modern transport often depends on shared infrastructure. Airships reveal an expectation that visible, elegant machines would dominate the sky, while actual aviation developed along less graceful and more militarized lines.

These images also show that the future is built from available materials. Artists rarely imagine technologies without precedent. They enlarge balloons, telegraphs, newspapers, electricity, steam power, automobiles, and early aviation. Even their most improbable machines are assembled from familiar visual parts. The future looks strange because its components have been rearranged, not because it has escaped history.

How to look at historical futurist images

1. Identify the present-day object being extended. Is the image starting with a balloon, a telephone, a newspaper, a factory, a train, or an automobile?
2. Separate function from form. A Téléphonoscope may anticipate remote entertainment or shopping in function while looking nothing like a modern screen.
3. Look for the imagined infrastructure. Who operates the machine? Who regulates it? Where does its energy come from? What happens when many people use it at once?
4. Read the social arrangement. Ask who works, who relaxes, who travels, who is watched, and who is excluded.
5. Check the medium and audience. A private notebook, a magazine cartoon, a commercial card, and a literary illustration make different claims on the viewer.
6. Distinguish later fame from original circulation. An image that is widely reproduced today may have had a small or uncertain audience when first made.

This method turns a gallery of amusing inventions into something more substantial: a history of hopes, anxieties, material limits, and social expectations.

The future as a portrait of its makers

Robida’s airborne Paris, Dart’s automated home, Heath’s comic infrastructure, Côté’s year 2000, and Dellschau’s airship notebooks do not form a single forecast. They are different kinds of visual arguments. Robida imagines the urban systems that might grow around flight. Dart uses convenience and machinery to make domestic and gender politics visible. Heath mocks the rhetoric of inevitable progress. Côté packages technological wonder for a fin-de-siècle audience. Dellschau turns aviation into a personal mythology and invented archive.

What unites them is the conviction that the future can be pictured. Once change became rapid, public, and mechanical, artists could make possible worlds look almost ordinary. They gave the future streets, uniforms, appliances, advertisements, classrooms, servants, postal routes, leisure activities, and household routines.

That is why these images continue to feel relevant. They do not prove that earlier artists possessed exceptional predictive powers. They show something more useful: every imagined future carries the fingerprints of the present that produced it. When we look at their flying cities and chemical dinners, we are also looking at their ideas about convenience, progress, work, gender, class, science, and risk—and at the assumptions our own future images will eventually reveal.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did these artists really predict the future?

Not in any simple sense. Some images resemble later technologies because they identified broad functions—remote communication, automated labor, air travel, or recorded news. Their actual mechanisms and social arrangements usually remained rooted in nineteenth- and early twentieth-century assumptions. They are better described as speculation, satire, or commercial fantasy than as accurate forecasts.

When were the Jean-Marc Côté year-2000 images made, and were they originally postcards?

The images commonly called En l’an 2000 were made around 1899–1900, with additional material dated 1901 and 1910. They are often described as postcards, but research indicates that the original paper cards were enclosed in cigarette or cigar boxes and were later reproduced or circulated as postcards. Financial problems limited their original distribution.

What makes Charles Dellschau different from the commercial futurist artists?

Charles Dellschau’s airship drawings and collages were made privately from about 1899 until shortly before his death. He assembled thousands of colorful works into notebooks, incorporating aviation clippings and references to the supposed Sonora Aero Club and “NB Gas.” Those names belong to his imaginative account or later art-historical framing, not verified aviation history.

The Bottom Line

The lasting value of historical futurist art is not its hit rate. These artists transformed balloons, electricity, telegraphs, machines, and mass media into pictures of everyday life, revealing the hopes and prejudices their own societies brought to the idea of progress.

Quick Recap

Bestseller No. 1

Futuredays: A Nineteenth Century Vision of the Year 2000

Used Book in Good Condition

$64.67

Bestseller No. 2

The Far Ends of Time and Earth (The Collected Fiction of Isaac Asimov ; V. 1)

$19.94

ThatPainter Team

Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.