Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

ThatPainter is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Learn More

A 17th-century portrait discovered during an estate house call in Camden, Maine, sold at Thomaston Place Auction Galleries on August 24, 2024, for a reported $1.41 million including auction fees. The sale does not establish that Rembrandt painted it: the auction catalog described the unsigned panel as “after Rembrandt,” meaning a work made in the artist’s style.

What sold, and where it came from

Auctioneer and appraiser Kaja Veilleux and an assistant found the portrait among paintings in the attic of a private Camden, Maine, estate. It appeared as lot 2363 in Thomaston Place Auction Galleries’ Summer Grandeur sale.

The painting is an unsigned oil on a cradled oak panel showing a young girl. It was presented in a hand-carved Dutch gold frame. A label on the reverse referred to a 1970 loan to the Philadelphia Museum of Art. That label documents part of the object’s history, but it is not proof of authorship.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Veilleux described the uncertainty typical of estate visits: “On house calls, we often go in blind, not knowing what we’ll find.”

#1 Best Overall

How much did the attic painting sell for?

Figure What it means Source and qualification
$1.175 million Hammer price—the winning bid before the buyer’s premium and other auction fees Iconotheca specialist record, 2026
$1.41 million Reported total including auction fees Smithsonian Magazine, 2024
$10,000–$15,000 Published pre-sale estimate Iconotheca specialist record, 2026

The difference between $1.175 million and $1.41 million is the distinction between the hammer bid and the buyer’s all-in cost. These numbers describe this one auction; they are not a general market value for paintings discovered in attics.

Is it really a Rembrandt?

There is no public authentication ruling in the reporting reviewed. Thomaston Place cataloged the work as “after Rembrandt”, not as a confirmed painting by Rembrandt van Rijn. In auction terminology, that wording generally indicates a later or workshop-related work that follows the artist’s style, without asserting that Rembrandt himself painted it.

The sale price therefore cannot be used as proof of authorship. The buyer was reported to be a private European collector, but the collector was not named and the painting’s current attribution was not publicly resolved.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Why visual resemblance is not enough

Seventeenth-century painters deliberately emulated Rembrandt. Betsy Wieseman, curator and head of the Department of Northern European Paintings at the National Gallery of Art, explained that “everybody was trying to look like Rembrandt during a certain period of time,” often suppressing individual traits to come close to his manner. A convincing resemblance can reflect that historical practice rather than direct authorship.

What an attribution investigation would examine

Experts quoted by the Press Herald said a serious attribution requires more than looking at the image. Relevant work can include:

  • Provenance research: tracing ownership, inventories, sales and exhibition or loan records.
  • Technical examination: studying the panel, ground, pigments, paint layers, underdrawing, surface changes and later restorations.
  • Comparative connoisseurship: testing the handling, materials and construction against securely documented Rembrandt paintings and known followers.
  • Conservation assessment: separating original paint from retouching or alteration that might affect what the surface appears to show.

The 1970 museum-loan label could provide a lead for records research, but a historical label alone cannot authenticate the picture.

Why the estimate and final price diverged

The auction estimate of $10,000–$15,000 was dramatically below the eventual result. A low estimate can reflect uncertainty about authorship, condition, provenance or buyer interest. Competitive bidding can then push the hammer price far beyond that range, especially when bidders place a premium on an unusual discovery or the possibility of a stronger attribution. The result still does not convert an uncertain attribution into a confirmed one.

What’s actually slowing this PC down?

Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Support on Ko-Fi

What this means for paintings found in an attic

An attic location is a discovery story, not an authentication category. Most inherited or long-stored paintings require identification, condition review and documentation before anyone can estimate their market position.

Practical first steps

  1. Do not clean, reframe or repair the painting. Altering the surface can destroy evidence and reduce options for examination.
  2. Photograph the front, back, frame, labels, inscriptions and damage. Keep the images with any estate paperwork.
  3. Record how the work was acquired. Note the previous owner, house location, dates, family documents and any old receipts or exhibition references.
  4. Seek an independent specialist opinion. A specialist in seventeenth-century Dutch painting can advise whether conservation, technical imaging or archival research is warranted.
  5. Compare sale options. An auction house may offer an appraisal and, if you consign, handle marketing and the sale for a commission. The Associated Press reported that Thomaston Place offers free appraisals and earns commission when items are consigned.

No appraisal or auction house can promise a result comparable to the Maine sale. The eventual price depends on what the evidence supports, the work’s condition and the bidders who participate.

Quick Recap

What remains established about the Maine portrait

  • It was found during a private-estate house call in Camden, Maine, rather than an archaeological excavation.
  • It sold at Thomaston Place Auction Galleries on August 24, 2024.
  • The reported all-in result was $1.41 million; a specialist record lists a $1.175 million hammer price.
  • The catalog called it “after Rembrandt.”
  • The buyer’s identity and any later change in attribution have not been publicly established in the sources reviewed.

Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.