Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchPC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Outbyte Driver Updater · freeRandom freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.
Find the Right Drivers →ThatPainter is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Learn More
Yes. Ubisoft disclosed that AI tools helped create some in-game assets in Anno 117: Pax Romana. The company says artists used those tools for iteration, prototyping and exploration, while the finished game reflects the team’s craft and creative vision. That disclosure does not identify every affected asset, establish a total count, or prove that every disputed image was AI-generated.
What Ubisoft actually disclosed
As reported by PC Gamer on November 18, 2025, the Steam disclosure states: “AI tools were used to help create some in game assets. In all such cases, the final product reflects our team’s craft and creative vision.” This is Ubisoft’s own description, not an independent inventory of the game’s art.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
ANNO 117: PAX ROMANA - Standard Edition, PlayStation 5 | $30.32 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
Anno 117: Pax Romana | Standard Edition | Xbox Series X│S Digital Code | $59.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
|
ANNO 117: PAX ROMANA – GOVERNOR’S EDITION, PC | $67.18 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
|
The Art of Anno 117: Pax Romana | $35.10 | Buy on Amazon |
The wording matters. “Some in game assets” is deliberately broad: it does not say how many assets were assisted, which departments used the tools, or whether a particular image began as an AI output, a conventional sketch, a texture, or a composite. It also does not mean that all of Anno 117’s artwork was generated by AI.
How Ubisoft says artists used the tools
In the same reporting, Ubisoft described AI as support for production rather than a replacement for the art team. The company said the artists used AI tools for “iterations, prototyping, and exploration,” and said the project had the franchise’s largest team of artists to meet its scope.
#1 Best Overall
- Pre-order Anno 117: Pax Romana* now to receive the Builder Pack with exclusive ornaments, and an exclusive player icon.**
- BUILD, TRADE, EXPAND
- BECOME A ROMAN GOVERNOR
- CHOOSE THE FATE OF YOUR PROVINCES
- Final content and release dates subject to change. Internet connection and Ubisoft Account required to redeem the digital content.
Those terms describe early and exploratory stages of a visual workflow:
- Iteration: rapidly testing variations before an artist settles on a direction.
- Prototyping: making a temporary visual to test layout, mood or communication in the game.
- Exploration: generating possibilities that may inform later, human-led design work.
Ubisoft’s explanation is attributed to the company; the cited reports do not independently document the studio’s internal process, review gates or the proportion of final pixels produced with assistance.
Rank #2
- BUILD TRADE EXPAND — Design thriving Roman cities, run production chains, and balance citizen needs with the relentless demands of the emperor.
- TWO PROVINCES TO GOVERN — Develop Latium’s Roman heartland and brave Albion’s Celtic wetlands, each offering distinct geography, culture, and challenges.
- DISCOVERY TREE PROGRESSION — Unlock new technologies to boost production efficiency, scale settlements, and deepen strategic options as your authority grows.
- DIPLOMACY AND WARFARE — Build alliances, navigate political intrigue, and command land battles and naval combat to protect your provinces and trade.
- CHOICES SHAPE YOUR RULE — Choose whether to honor Celtic culture or enforce Roman traditions, and select island deities for powerful gameplay bonuses.
The disputed image and the promised patch
Players drew attention to an image whose visible defects prompted criticism of both its appearance and the decision to include AI-assisted material. Ubisoft reportedly called that image “a placeholder asset that unintentionally slipped through our review process,” as reported by PC Gamer on November 16, 2025.
The company said it would replace the image in an upcoming patch identified in the report as version 1.3. The available reporting does not verify that the replacement shipped, what the replacement looks like, or whether other assets were changed. “Placeholder” is therefore Ubisoft’s explanation for that incident, not proof that every criticized image had the same origin.
Rank #3
- Pre-order now to get Anno 117: Pax Romana – Governor's Edition and its exclusive content**.
- BUILD, TRADE, EXPAND
- BECOME A ROMAN GOVERNOR
- CHOOSE THE FATE OF YOUR PROVINCES
- Internet connection and Ubisoft Account required to redeem digital content.
What is established—and what is not
| Question | What the available reporting establishes | What remains unresolved |
|---|---|---|
| Were AI tools used? | Ubisoft disclosed AI-tool assistance for some in-game assets. | No complete public list or asset count is provided. |
| What was the intended role? | Ubisoft described iteration, prototyping and exploration. | The reports do not independently document the exact workflow or review process. |
| Was a criticized image AI-generated? | Ubisoft reportedly called one image a placeholder that slipped review. | The evidence does not establish the provenance of every disputed image. |
| Was it fixed? | Ubisoft reportedly planned a replacement in patch 1.3. | The cited coverage does not confirm the patch’s final result. |
| How did players respond? | Reports describe criticism of visible defects and AI-assisted art. | That coverage does not represent the views of all players. |
Why painters and visual-art readers are scrutinizing it
Craft is not the same as tool provenance
For a painting-focused audience, the central distinction is between how an image was initiated and how it was resolved. A concept generated during exploration can still be substantially redrawn, composited, color-scripted and integrated by artists. Conversely, a temporary image that reaches a public build can be judged as finished work regardless of its intended status.
Ubisoft’s statement asserts that the final product reflects its team’s craft and vision. The reported placeholder incident shows why audiences may still evaluate the visible result first: unclear hands, inconsistent lettering, implausible details or stylistic discontinuities are quality-control concerns whether or not AI was involved.
Rank #4
Disclosure changes the question, but not the visual test
The disclosure gives players useful provenance information, yet it does not settle aesthetic or ethical debates about training data, authorship, labor, or acceptable use. Those are separate questions from whether a particular asset communicates clearly and meets the game’s visual standard.
Timeline of the reported events
- November 12, 2025: PC Gamer lists this as Anno 117: Pax Romana’s release date.
- November 16, 2025: PC Gamer reports Ubisoft’s placeholder explanation and planned replacement in patch 1.3.
- November 18, 2025: PC Gamer reports Ubisoft’s characterization of the launch as the fastest-selling in the series’ 25-year history. No sales figure or independent ranking is supplied in the cited passage.
- December 7, 2025: A Reddit post discusses an alleged paid official art book. The post does not verify the book’s listing, availability or contents.
How to interpret the controversy without overclaiming
- Do not describe every image in Anno 117 as AI-generated; Ubisoft disclosed assistance for only “some” assets.
- Do not treat the planned patch as confirmed remediation unless a current Ubisoft or game-build record verifies what shipped.
- Separate visible quality criticism from claims about an image’s provenance.
- Treat the art-book discussion as an unverified community lead, not evidence of a confirmed product.
The most defensible conclusion is narrow: Ubisoft acknowledged AI-tool assistance in part of Anno 117’s asset creation and defended the final work as artist-led. Public reporting documents a disputed placeholder and a promised replacement, but it does not provide a complete asset inventory or establish the final remediation status.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
