Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchWindows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallOutbyte Driver Updater · freeOne free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.
Scan My Drivers Free →ThatPainter is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Learn More
The Bihar School of Athens was a Patna-based artistic circle in which European, Anglo-Indian and Indian artists and patrons worked alongside one another. Formed under East India Company civil servant and amateur artist Charles D’Oyly, the association brought European picturesque practice into contact with Patna’s older Mughal, Murshidabad and local traditions.
It was not a modern art academy. “Bihar School of Athens” is a local or later name associated with D’Oyly’s circle, which was also called the United Patna and Gaya Society. Its members drew, painted and made lithographs of people, streets, landscapes, plants and animals, helping make early nineteenth-century Patna one of the most revealing sites of artistic exchange in colonial India.
What was the Bihar School of Athens?
The society was established in Patna on July 1, 1824, under Charles D’Oyly. Its alternate name, the United Patna and Gaya Society, reflects the geographical world of its members rather than a formal institutional charter. D’Oyly described the purpose of his Bihar society as “the promotion of arts and sciences and for the circulation of fun and merriment of all descriptions.”
That wording captures the group’s dual character. It was an art-making association, but also a social and intellectual coterie. Meetings were linked to D’Oyly’s household and to the Patna residence of Raja Mitrajit Singh, ruler of Tekari. The British Library catalogue says that D’Oyly’s bungalow was apparently used for gatherings of the artistic and literary circle inspired by him.
#1 Best Overall
The society’s importance lies less in a single style or manifesto than in its mixed membership and working environment. European artists did not simply import a finished method into an empty field: they worked in a city with its own commercial and courtly painting traditions, while Indian artists adapted selected European techniques and subjects.
Charles D’Oyly and the Patna setting
D’Oyly’s career
Charles D’Oyly was born in Murshidabad in 1781 and entered the Bengal civil service as a young man. After serving in Dacca and Calcutta, he became Patna’s commercial resident and opium agent. Patna was his most productive artistic base, giving him access to local artists, patrons, collectors and the visual life of a major colonial city.
D’Oyly was an amateur rather than a full-time professional painter, but his status gave the circle organization and resources. George Chinnery served as patron, while C. W. Smith was vice president. Chinnery regarded D’Oyly as “The best gentleman artist he had ever met,” a contemporary assessment quoted in the University of Edinburgh’s Elizabeth Ross Manuscript.
Patna before the society
Patna already supported a vigorous painting economy shaped by Mughal and Murshidabad conventions and by local commissions. Artists worked for European residents, Indian elites and commercial clients. The society therefore operated within an existing artistic environment, not outside it.
Rank #2
The resulting Patna Kalam combined these inherited practices with European influence. A characteristic local convention was the kajli siayhi black-ink outline. Patna painters represented ordinary streets and workers as well as rulers, officials and other elite subjects, making the city’s social life a recurring theme.
Who took part?
The association crossed the racial categories that structured colonial society, although it remained shaped by colonial power and patronage. Its documented participants included Europeans, Anglo-Indians and Indians.
| Role or group | Named participants |
|---|---|
| Leadership and patronage | Charles D’Oyly, president; George Chinnery, patron; C. W. Smith, vice president |
| European and Anglo-Indian members named in accounts | Elizabeth Jane D’Oyly, James Young, John Elliot, Mary Fendall, Sarah Amherst and Robert Smith |
| Indian artists associated with the society | Shiv Dayal and Jai Ram Das |
| Wider Patna artistic environment | Hulas Lal, Nisar Mehdi, Sewak Ram and Fakir Chand Lal |
Jai Ram Das assisted at the Behar Lithographic Press, showing that Indian participation extended beyond supplying paintings for European patrons. The surviving record does not establish a membership total, so the society should not be described as having a fixed or known number of artists.
How the circle made and circulated art
Drawing and painting
Members worked across several kinds of subject matter: everyday activities, urban views, landscapes, flora and fauna. This range connected the picturesque taste popular among European artists with the practical demands of recording a place, its people and its natural history.
The Behar Lithographic Press
D’Oyly operated the Behar Lithographic Press from 1828 to 1832. Lithography allowed drawings to be reproduced and shared more widely than unique paintings. The Behar Amateur Lithographic Scrapbooks, dated 1828–1830, contain work by European and Indian artists and provide the clearest surviving record of the collaborative print culture around the society.
The press also connected Patna’s artists to illustrated publications. Works issued or contributed to by the press included:
- Feathered Game of Hindostan (1828)
- Indian Sports (1829)
- Costumes of India (1830)
- Sketches of the New Road in Journey from Calcutta to Gyah (1830)
These titles show how the circle moved between local observation, natural-history imagery, costume studies, travel views and leisure subjects. They also demonstrate that the Bihar School of Athens was not only a meeting place: it had a material system for reproducing and distributing images.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →What did Indian and European artists exchange?
European methods in a local tradition
European members brought conventions associated with picturesque travel art, including an interest in carefully observed scenery, people at work and the visual effects of place. D’Oyly’s own practice and his press helped make those approaches influential in Patna.
Rank #4
Indian adaptation rather than passive imitation
Indian artists did not merely copy European originals. They adapted compositions, subjects and techniques to local expectations and established workshop practice. The Patna Kalam’s black-ink outlining and its attention to both ordinary and elite life show continuity with regional art even when the subject or viewpoint was encouraged by European patrons.
A Patna miniature dated about 1830 in the David Collection makes the point particularly clearly. It is based on D’Oyly’s image Tom Raw, the Griffin, but was made by an unidentified Indian artist. Indian and European figures receive relatively even-handed treatment, suggesting visual adaptation and negotiation rather than mechanical reproduction.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Why the society is historically unusual
The Bihar School of Athens can be understood in two complementary ways. It was unusually open, for its period, in bringing Indian, Anglo-Indian and European participants into a shared artistic association. At the same time, the circle operated inside colonial institutions in which European officials controlled money, status and access to publication.
Calling the exchange reciprocal does not erase that imbalance. It identifies what the surviving work shows: Patna’s artists contributed skills, conventions and subjects, while D’Oyly and other Europeans introduced new networks, equipment and picturesque models. The resulting images belong neither exclusively to a European tradition nor to an untouched local one.
What survives today?
| Evidence | Date or period | What it shows |
|---|---|---|
| Behar Amateur Lithographic Scrapbooks | 1828–1830 | Collaborative lithographs by European and Indian artists working around D’Oyly’s press |
| Behar Lithographic Press | Operating 1828–1832 | The printing infrastructure that circulated images associated with the Patna circle |
| Patna miniature in the David Collection | About 1830 | An unidentified Indian artist’s adaptation of D’Oyly’s Tom Raw, the Griffin |
| British Library catalogue record for the D’Oyly bungalow | Nineteenth-century archival evidence | The building apparently used for meetings of the artistic and literary coterie |
These objects and records are more reliable guides to the society than the grand-sounding name alone. They document a network of people, workshops and publications rather than a single school with uniform rules.
How to understand the Bihar School of Athens
The most accurate description is a Patna-based colonial-era art society that joined European amateur and professional interests to Indian artistic knowledge. Its paintings, drawings and prints recorded the city and its surroundings, while its members’ interactions helped shape Patna Kalam.
Its legacy is therefore double. The society reveals the reach of European picturesque culture in British India, but it also preserves evidence of Indian artists actively interpreting, redirecting and embedding that culture within Patna’s own visual traditions.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
