The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →
ThatPainter is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Learn More
Epping Generation House is a multigenerational home in Epping, New South Wales, planned for a young family and nearby grandparents who wanted to live on one site without giving up household independence. Vanessa Wegner Architect organizes the project around a shared arrival, hallway and courtyard, then gives each family its own entrance and living territory. The result is a useful case study in balancing everyday contact with clear privacy boundaries—although the published project descriptions do not provide measured energy, ventilation, accessibility or post-occupancy results.
What Epping Generation House is
Epping Generation House is a completed residential project by Vanessa Wegner Architect in Epping, Sydney, on Wallumedegal Country. It was conceived for two related households: an older couple, Narelle and Jeffrey, and their daughter’s family, Alistair and Claire with their two children. The younger family owned a large suburban site containing a deteriorated 1950s bungalow. Their grandparents lived nearby, and the brief was to create one shared home that allowed the generations to remain close while retaining meaningful separation.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
The project is best understood as a coordinated arrangement of two household zones rather than as a conventional single-family plan with a granny flat added at the back. A common front-door experience and central courtyard establish connection. Beyond that shared threshold, separate entrances lead to distinct areas for each household. The descriptions do not establish whether the portions are separate legal dwellings, so the project should not be presented as a confirmed dual-occupancy approval.
Published dates are inconsistent. Architecture & Design lists the project as complete in 2023, while Archilovers describes the work as finished in 2024. ARQA’s detailed project article was published on 14 November 2024. Because no primary source in the available material resolves the difference, the safest description is “completed project, listed as 2023 by Architecture & Design and 2024 by Archilovers.”
#1 Best Overall
Project facts and credits
| Item | Published information |
|---|---|
| Project | Epping Generation House |
| Location | Epping, New South Wales, Sydney; ARQA identifies Wallumedegal Country |
| Architect | Vanessa Wegner Architect |
| Status | Complete / completed works in the listed sources |
| Year | 2023 in the Architecture & Design listing; 2024 in the Archilovers listing |
| Clients credited by ARQA | Narelle and Jeffrey; Alistair and Claire and their two children |
| Builder | M J Minard Constructions in ARQA; “MJ Minard Builders” in the Archilovers credit |
| Photography | Tom Ferguson |
The brief: proximity without forced togetherness
The design challenge was social as much as architectural. The families wanted to share a property and remain available to one another, but they did not want every meal, visitor or bedtime routine to occur in a common room. The grandparents also needed more space than a typical granny-flat arrangement would provide. That requirement shaped a plan in which independence is built into circulation, thresholds and levels rather than left to furniture or informal rules.
The original bungalow supplied a reference point for the street elevation. The new house sits back from the street and keeps a modest scale that echoes the bungalow instead of announcing a large, multi-household building. This restrained frontage is important to the project’s strategy: the complexity of the internal arrangement is not expressed as a collection of competing front doors or an oversized facade.
How the shared-to-private sequence works
1. A common arrival
Approach from the street leads to a single entry. Both households therefore share the first moment of arrival, which can make the home feel like one family place rather than two unrelated apartments. The arrangement also gives visitors an obvious point of entry instead of asking them to identify which side of the property belongs to which generation.
2. Shared hallway and central courtyard
From the entry, a common hallway and central courtyard form the project’s connective spine. The courtyard is neither a fully public front yard nor a private backyard assigned to one household. It is an intermediate room where family members can cross paths, pause, or meet without entering another household’s living area.
3. Separate thresholds
After the shared sequence, the plan divides into two entrances. This is the key privacy mechanism. Each family can move from the common zone into its own home, close a door and host, rest or manage daily routines without passing through the other family’s rooms. The distinction is architectural and repeatable, rather than dependent on an agreement that may become difficult as routines change.
Where each household lives
The older couple’s eastern portion
The eastern side is described as a single-level home for the older couple. It contains bedrooms, living areas and a guest room. Keeping this part on one level supports straightforward daily movement and reduces the need to negotiate stairs between sleeping, bathing and living spaces. The source material calls the arrangement easy to access, but it does not provide a formal accessibility schedule, circulation widths, bathroom specifications, lift provision or certification. Those details would need to be confirmed in drawings and compliance documents for any new project.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →The younger family’s western portion
The younger family occupies the western portion. Their living spaces and kitchen connect to a lower garden and pool level that spans the width of the site. This gives the family a direct relationship with outdoor activity and allows the children’s or family spaces to extend toward the landscape. It also makes the section of the house more vertically layered than the grandparents’ single-level area.
The difference between the two portions is deliberate rather than symmetrical. The grandparents receive a compact, level arrangement suited to their everyday needs, while the younger family’s rooms connect to a lower, more active garden and pool setting. A multigenerational plan does not have to give every household the same number of rooms or the same section of the site; it has to give each household an appropriate and dignified way to live.
Rank #3
- New
- Mint Condition
- Dispatch same day for order received before 12 noon
- Guaranteed packaging
- No quibbles returns
Light, air and landscape connections
East and west highlight windows
Highlight windows run along the east and west sides and continue the central spine. Their position brings daylight into circulation and shared areas while maintaining a degree of separation from neighboring properties. Because they are high-level openings, they can admit light without functioning like a direct picture window into an adjacent room or yard.
North-facing floor-to-ceiling glazing
On the north side, floor-to-ceiling windows overlook a valley. The glazing is described as a way to connect interior rooms with the outlook and to bring substantial daylight into the living spaces. The published descriptions present daylight, airflow and landscape connection as design intentions and features. They do not report daylight-factor calculations, energy use, indoor-air measurements, glazing performance, shading coefficients or thermal modelling, so those outcomes should not be inferred.
Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallOutdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchCourtyards, terraces and window seats
Courtyards and terraces provide several scales of outdoor use. A courtyard near the shared spine can support an informal encounter between generations; a terrace can extend one household’s living room; and a window seat can offer a solitary place to read or watch the landscape without leaving the home. These are small but consequential choices in a multigenerational house, where the need for contact and the need for retreat occur on the same day.
Why the circulation strategy matters
In many shared-family homes, privacy fails at the circulation points: one household must cross another’s kitchen, visitors arrive through a bedroom zone, or an outdoor area is technically shared but practically claimed by one family. Epping Generation House puts the negotiation point at the front of the plan. The hallway and courtyard are shared; the entrances beyond them are not. That makes the social contract legible to residents and guests.
The strategy also allows different rhythms. Grandparents can remain in their eastern home while the younger family uses the western rooms and lower garden. A guest can be welcomed into one household without automatically entering the other. At the same time, the central courtyard and common arrival preserve opportunities for spontaneous contact that a pair of completely detached houses would not provide.
Regulatory and planning questions the project raises
ARQA says the need to meet complying-development requirements shaped the design challenge. The available project description does not state the approval pathway, zoning controls, floor-area ratio, setbacks, fire separation, parking arrangement or legal classification of the two portions. Anyone using this project as a precedent should treat those matters as open questions rather than assuming that its plan can be reproduced under the same rules elsewhere.
Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallOutdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchRegulation is especially important when a family wants two entrances or two kitchens. Those features may support privacy, but they do not by themselves determine whether a building is legally one dwelling, two dwellings, a secondary dwelling or another category. A local planning professional and building certifier would need to test the proposal against the applicable New South Wales and council requirements.
What the project demonstrates—and what it does not
| Design question | What is documented | What remains unestablished |
|---|---|---|
| Privacy | Shared entry, hallway and courtyard followed by separate entrances and household zones | Acoustic ratings, door specifications or measured privacy performance |
| Accessibility | Older couple’s home is single-level and described as easy to access | Formal universal-design dimensions, compliant bathrooms, ramps, lifts or certification |
| Daylight | East and west highlight windows and north-facing floor-to-ceiling glazing | Daylight calculations, glare control or annual sunlight results |
| Ventilation | Openings and courtyards are described as supporting airflow | Measured air-change rates, cross-ventilation diagrams or indoor-air data |
| Landscape connection | Valley outlook, courtyards, terraces, window seats and lower garden/pool level | Landscape construction details, planting schedule or maintenance performance |
| Approvals | Complying-development requirements influenced the brief | Approval documents, zoning details and legal dwelling status |
Using Epping Generation House as a planning model
The project is most useful as a set of questions rather than a template to copy. Before designing a similar home, families should map who needs access to which rooms, when shared spaces are genuinely useful and where a resident must be able to withdraw completely.
Best Value
- Define the shared threshold: Decide whether the common area is only an entry and passage, or whether it includes a courtyard, laundry, dining room or other room that both households will actively use.
- Give each household a clear front door beyond the shared zone: A private threshold allows residents to control visitors, noise and daily routines.
- Place the least mobile household on the simplest route: A single-level arrangement can reduce travel between essential rooms, but verify every dimension against the occupants’ actual needs.
- Separate bedrooms from high-traffic family areas: The younger family’s connection to a lower garden and pool illustrates how active spaces can be grouped away from another household’s quieter rooms.
- Provide more than one kind of outdoor room: A central courtyard, a private terrace and a window seat support different degrees of interaction.
- Test the plan at busy times: Draw arrival with groceries, school drop-off, a visiting nurse, overnight guests and pool use. Conflicts often appear in circulation before they appear in room schedules.
- Check approvals early: Confirm whether the intended arrangement qualifies under the local planning and building pathway before committing to two kitchens, entrances or service zones.
Questions to ask when comparing other multigenerational homes
Epping Generation House offers practical comparison criteria for anyone evaluating another project or commissioning a new one.
| Comparison axis | Questions to ask |
|---|---|
| Shared circulation | Which doors, halls, courtyards and outdoor areas are common, and exactly where does each household’s private territory begin? |
| Daily accessibility | Can the household with the greatest mobility needs reach bedroom, bathroom, kitchen and outdoor space without stairs or narrow pinch points? |
| Guest accommodation | Is a guest room located within the host household’s zone, or will visitors cross another family’s rooms? |
| Site and levels | Does the plan use slope, outlook, garden and pool areas to give each household a distinct but valuable relationship with the site? |
| Privacy over time | Will doors, acoustic separation and outdoor boundaries still work when children grow, care needs change or one household hosts visitors? |
| Regulatory path | What approvals, classifications, fire measures, parking rules and servicing arrangements make the plan lawful in its location? |
Bottom line for readers studying the project
Epping Generation House shows how a multigenerational home can be both shared and divided. Its strongest move is the sequence from one arrival to a common hallway and courtyard, then to two separate entrances. The eastern, single-level home gives the older couple an independent base, while the western family zone opens toward a lower garden and pool level. Highlight windows, north-facing glazing, courtyards, terraces and window seats add layers of light, outlook and retreat.
Those qualities are documented design intentions, not proof of quantified performance. The project’s year is also listed differently—2023 and 2024—so any formal citation should name the listing being used. As a precedent, the house is valuable because it makes the difficult part of multigenerational living visible: deciding which moments should be shared, and designing every other threshold so that privacy remains practical.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
