Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems2Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute3Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors
ThatPainter is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Learn More
Rawalpindi’s old Hindu temples and Sikh-linked religious sites preserve material traces of a more religiously diverse city, but they do not tell a single story of decline. Recent reporting describes buildings that are closed, neglected, used as a school or shop, and—in the case of Krishna Mandir—under reconstruction. The memory of a more inclusive past comes in part from personal testimony, while the buildings themselves show how communities and devotional traditions once shared the city’s urban landscape.
What the old temples can—and cannot—tell us
A 2015 feature described Rawalpindi as once predominantly inhabited by Hindus and Sikhs and recorded local memories of a more inclusive era. It also recounted the family history of Jagmohan Arorra, a longtime resident and caretaker of Krishna Mandir, whose mother was Sikh and father Hindu. That testimony offers a specific example of intertwined community life; it is not proof that every group experienced the city equally or that its history was free of tension. The feature’s figures and descriptions belong to its reporting at the time, not to a current census. Read the 2015 feature.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
The Book of Temples: Spiritual Places Around the World | $48.51 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
Temples of South India (HB) | $56.98 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
![Amazing Temples of the World (Amazing Places [Portrait format])](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51cEPal5smS._SL160_.jpg)
|
Amazing Temples of the World (Amazing Places [Portrait format]) | $20.27 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
|
Temples of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints | $19.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 5 |
|
Temples of India : Abode Of The Divine (HB) | $59.99 | Buy on Amazon |
The buildings add another kind of evidence: their locations, architectural details, painted imagery and changing uses. They also reveal different outcomes. A closed sanctuary, a school occupying a former temple and an active site undergoing reconstruction should not be collapsed into a single picture of abandonment.
Krishna Mandir: reconstruction interrupted public worship
The 2015 feature placed Krishna Mandir near Rawalpindi railway station, described it as a two-storey building built in 1897, and said it was then open to the public. That access description is historical, not current.
#1 Best Overall
In a report dated 3 May 2026, Dawn said reconstruction had not finished after ten months. The Evacuee Trust Property Board took charge of the temple on 12 June 2025, and work began the following month. The puja room and veranda remained intact while other parts of the building were being reconstructed. Community members told Dawn they could not hold mass gatherings for Diwali and Holi, and that many worshippers prayed at home. The report put the project cost at Rs40 million and quoted Punjab Minister for Minority Affairs Ramesh Singh Arora directing that work be completed quickly. The report does not establish whether reconstruction finished after its publication. Dawn’s 3 May 2026 report.
Ganj Mandi Temple: paintings that cross familiar boundaries
In Bismillah Market, Ganj Mandi Temple preserves a striking mix of religious imagery. Anthropologist Zulfiqar Ali Kalhoro writes that the building appears to date from the first or second quarter of the twentieth century. Its interior has triple recessed arches, floral painting, squinches and false arches that transition the square room toward an octagonal shikhara.
Rank #2
Painted niches depict Shiva, Vishnu and Lakshmi, Ganapati, Anantashayana Vishnu, Durga and Sri Chand. Another shows Guru Nanak with Bhai Bala and Bhai Mardana. Kalhoro calls the Guru Nanak image unusual in a Hindu temple and notes that Udasi temples can depict both Hindu deities and Sikh Gurus. He suggests the site may have connections to Udasi or Nath yogis, but presents that as an interpretation rather than a settled identification.
The images are also a record of physical loss. Weather exposure has badly faded the paintings. Kalhoro revisited the site over more than two decades, most recently in February 2025. He observed pickle-making utensils stored in the main sanctuary in 2009; on later visits through 2025, he found the temple closed. Rooms once used to accommodate pilgrims had dwindled to one or two. His description captures both the artistry and its fragility: “This temple, associated either with the Udasi or Nath yogis, was one of the magnificent buildings of its time. It has now lost its original beauty.” Kalhoro’s account in The News on Sunday, 28 September 2025.
Other reported sites have different present-day uses
A 2026 Nukta report describes several other Rawalpindi sites. These are journalistic accounts of conditions, not a comprehensive field survey or independently verified inventory.
| Site | Reported use or condition |
|---|---|
| Kalyan Das Temple, Kohati Bazaar | Built in 1880, according to Nukta; currently used as a school for visually impaired children. |
| Raghunath Temple Complex, Bagh Sardaran | Includes three Hindu temples and two Sikh gurdwaras; reported closed to the public. |
| Mahadev Temple, Sarafa Bazaar | The lower structure is reported to be used as a cloth shop. |
| Valmiki Mandir, Lalkurti Bazaar | Reported neglected. |
Nukta attributes to State Minister for Religious Affairs and Interfaith Harmony Kheeal Das the count of 18 temples maintained by the Evacuee Trust Board, with only some continuing to serve religious communities. This is an attributed administrative figure, not a verified count of all surviving temples in Rawalpindi. The report’s examples show why present use matters: reuse, restricted access and neglect are distinct conditions. Nukta’s 2026 report.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Preservation is uneven, and restoration is not the same as completion
Krishna Mandir’s reconstruction demonstrates that preservation work can be underway even while worshippers face limits on gatherings. The latest dated status available here is Dawn’s report of 3 May 2026; it documents incomplete work at that point, not what happened afterward. Official statements about protecting heritage or religious freedom should likewise be understood as statements by officials, rather than independent assessments of conditions at every site.
For Ganj Mandi, the documented evidence is the deteriorated artwork and Kalhoro’s repeated visits, not a reported restoration project. Nukta’s accounts of the other sites identify current uses or neglect but do not establish a uniform conservation assessment. The available reporting does not provide a consistent survey with which to rank the temples by condition or restoration success.
Best Value
A layered record of Rawalpindi’s religious landscape
Together, these sites preserve more than façades. Krishna Mandir’s changing access, Ganj Mandi’s unusual blend of imagery, and the varied uses reported at other temples make the city’s history visible in specific places. Their evidence is strongest when read with care: testimony is attributed, architectural interpretation remains qualified, and present-day conditions are tied to the dates on which journalists or researchers recorded them.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
