Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Outbyte Driver Updater · freeRandom freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.
Find the Right Drivers →ThatPainter is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Learn More
John Henrik Clarke’s short story The Boy Who Painted Christ Black follows Aaron Crawford, a talented Black student in segregated Georgia who gives his teacher a painting of Jesus with Black features. The image provokes an institutional confrontation: supervisor Professor Danual calls it sacrilegious, while Principal George Du Vaul defends Aaron’s right to imagine Christ in his own community’s image. Du Vaul loses his position, but continues teaching and encouraging Aaron. The story’s moral victory comes through artistic courage, cultural memory, and solidarity rather than professional power.
What happens in The Boy Who Painted Christ Black?
Aaron Crawford attends a segregated school in Georgia and is recognized as a gifted young artist. For his teacher’s birthday, he presents her with a painting of Christ portrayed as Black. The picture becomes controversial when Professor Danual, the school supervisor, sees it and declares the image sacrilegious.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
100 African Americans Who Shaped American History: Incredible Stories of Black Heroes (Black History... | $7.49 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
The Resurrectionist: The Lost Work of Dr. Spencer Black | $12.55 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
|
Black Christmas | $18.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
|
The Graveyard Book: A Newbery Award Winner | $6.33 | Buy on Amazon |
| 5 |
|
The Scary Book | $12.95 | Buy on Amazon |
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Aaron explains that he painted Christ after Principal George Du Vaul told students that Black people had as much right to portray Jesus as white people did. Du Vaul does not retreat from that lesson. He publicly accepts responsibility, arguing that people commonly represent God in the image of their own race and culture.
Danual treats Du Vaul’s teaching as an abuse of authority and demands his resignation. Du Vaul leaves the principalship, then accepts summer work teaching art. He also receives permission to continue encouraging Aaron. The final image shows the two walking together with dignity, turning a professional defeat into a statement of moral and creative independence.
#1 Best Overall
- non-fiction african american book set
- non-fiction black book set
- non-fiction african american children's book set
- non-fiction black children's book set
Who are the main characters?
Aaron Crawford
Aaron is the student whose painting gives the story its central conflict. His work is not presented as a prank or an attack on religion; it is an earnest act of artistic and cultural self-definition.
George Du Vaul
Du Vaul is the principal who supports Aaron and teaches Black history, achievement, and the right to create images that reflect Black experience. His willingness to accept blame makes him an adult ally rather than a distant authority figure.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Professor Danual
Danual represents the supervisory power structure. By calling the painting sacrilegious and demanding Du Vaul’s resignation, he attempts to enforce a single, white-centered religious convention as the institutional norm.
Rank #2
What does the painting of Christ mean?
The painting challenges the assumption that a familiar religious figure must always be represented as white. Clarke makes the image a test of who is allowed to imagine sacred subjects and whose cultural experience is treated as authoritative.
Du Vaul’s defense connects representation with dignity. His argument is not that one racial image must replace every other image of Christ. It is that Black students should be free to portray a sacred figure in ways that acknowledge their own humanity, history, and community.
Du Vaul states his position plainly in the story: “I don’t think the boy is so far wrong in painting Christ black.” Later, he accepts responsibility by saying, “I encouraged the boy in painting that picture.” Both lines are fictional dialogue spoken by Du Vaul, not statements recorded from Clarke.
Rank #3
Major themes
Representation and belonging
Aaron’s painting asks who gets to see themselves reflected in religious and cultural images. The dispute is therefore about belonging as much as appearance: a Black child’s vision is treated as legitimate by Du Vaul and as dangerous by Danual.
Artistic freedom under institutional control
The school can regulate employment and punish educators, but it cannot erase the meaning of Aaron’s act. The story places creative expression inside a power struggle over curriculum, authority, and acceptable ideas.
Cultural memory and Black history
Du Vaul teaches students about African history and Black achievement. His support for Aaron’s painting is part of a broader effort to counter educational traditions that center white experience and marginalize Black accomplishments.
Mentorship and solidarity
The relationship between Aaron and Du Vaul gives the story its emotional force. Du Vaul’s public defense protects a student who has less institutional power, and his continued art teaching shows that mentorship can survive the loss of a title.
Moral victory without institutional victory
Du Vaul does not win the administrative battle: he leaves the principal’s post. Yet the conclusion refuses to equate employment status with justice. His continued support of Aaron and the pair’s dignified walk suggest that integrity and creative freedom outlast the authority that tried to suppress them.
Why the segregated-school setting matters
The Georgia school is not merely a backdrop. Segregation determines whose knowledge is considered normal and gives Danual’s objection institutional force. In that setting, a classroom lesson about Black history and a Black image of Christ can both be treated as challenges to the racial order.
Best Value
- Orders are despatched from our UK warehouse next working day.
The story also shows that resistance does not have to take the form of a public speech or organized protest. Aaron paints; Du Vaul teaches and accepts responsibility. Their actions expose how ordinary educational choices can become politically consequential under segregation.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Publication and reading context
A literary commentary commonly dates the story to 1940, although that date is secondary-source reporting rather than a confirmed original publication record. A bibliography identifies a print appearance in Gloria M. Simmons and Helene D. Hutchinson’s anthology Black Culture: Reading and Writing Black (Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1972), pages 163–167.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →The complete story is reproduced in Joan Taylor’s University of Pennsylvania Teachers Institute curriculum unit, School Daze: Engagement Strategies for Middle School Readers. The unit is intended for Grade 8 and can be used through Grade 10, making the story especially suitable for classroom discussion of symbolism, authority, race, and visual culture.
Screen adaptation: America’s Dream
A segment of the 1996 television anthology drama America’s Dream is based on Clarke’s story. TV Guide lists Wesley Snipes as George Du Vaul and Norman D. Golden II as Aaron in that segment. Those cast details confirm the adaptation and the two principal roles; current streaming or physical-media availability is not established here.
Readers comparing the story and the television segment should examine characterization, dialogue, the handling of segregation, and the ending directly rather than assuming that an adaptation preserves every scene or emphasis from the written version.
Questions for painting and literature discussion
- What changes when a sacred figure is represented through a different racial or cultural viewpoint?
- Does Aaron’s painting challenge religion, or does it challenge a restricted tradition of religious imagery?
- Which carries more weight in the story: Danual’s official authority or Du Vaul’s ethical authority?
- How do the final image and Du Vaul’s summer teaching redefine what success means?
- What other classroom images, textbooks, or works of art might raise similar questions about who is represented?
Finding the print source
The most specifically identified print source is Black Culture: Reading and Writing Black, where the story is cited on pages 163–167. Listings and editions can change, so verify that a current book record matches the anthology title, editors, publisher, and page range before purchasing or assigning it.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
