Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches2Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems3Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute
ThatPainter is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Learn More
Bill Henson was not charged over the photographs at the centre of the 2008 controversy: after police seized 20 images, the NSW Director of Public Prosecutions advised there was no reasonable prospect of conviction. Separately, the Australian Classification Board rated the particular image that prompted the dispute PG and described it as “not sexualised to any degree.” Neither decision settled the wider argument about child protection, artistic context and freedom of expression.
What was planned for the Sydney exhibition?
Photographer Bill Henson’s exhibition was scheduled to open at Roslyn Oxley9 Gallery in Sydney on 22 May 2008. Before the photographs went on display, police closed the planned opening. ABC reported that the gallery and Henson agreed to suspend the exhibition temporarily while police made inquiries, including speaking with the photographed subject and her parents. ABC’s report of the closure records the sequence as it unfolded.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
The Light Fades but the Gods Remain | $80.00 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
Bill Henson | $30.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
|
Bill Henson: Lux et Nox | $1,060.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
|
STRANGERS: The First ICP Triennial of Photography and Video | $37.50 | Buy on Amazon |
| 5 |
|
SIC TRANSIT | $235.00 | Buy on Amazon |
What did police and prosecutors do?
Police investigated whether the photographs might warrant legal action. In its 6 June 2008 report, ABC said police had seized 20 of Henson’s photographs. The number refers to the images seized, not the total number planned for the exhibition or a set of images all individually adjudicated.
The NSW Director of Public Prosecutions advised police there was “no reasonable prospect of conviction.” Henson would not face charges over the photographs in that matter. This was prosecutorial advice, not a court trial or acquittal. ABC’s contemporaneous account of the decision also reported Henson’s response: “It is reassuring to see existing laws, having been rigorously tested, still provide a framework in which debate and expression of ideas can occur.”
#1 Best Overall
What did the Classification Board decide?
In a separate process, the Australian Classification Board rated the image that had prompted the controversy PG, describing that particular image as “not sexualised to any degree,” according to ABC’s 2008 report. That classification applied to the image under consideration. It was not a blanket ruling about every photograph in the seized group, all images of minors, or whether such images are appropriate in every context.
Why did people disagree?
The dispute brought different questions together: whether images of unclothed minors could cause harm or amount to exploitation; what circumstances and consent surrounded their making; how artistic context affects interpretation; and what role police and classification processes should have. People who raised child-protection and commercial-sexual-exploitation concerns did not necessarily accept that an artistic purpose answered those concerns. Conversely, critics of the police intervention argued that closing an exhibition before the work could be seen threatened artistic freedom and expression.
Rank #2
Then-opposition leader Malcolm Turnbull put the freedom-of-expression objection this way in a passage later revisited by ABC: “Freedom is a very precious thing. And before we have policemen tramping through art galleries, tramping through libraries, we’ve got to think: freedom is what makes this country great.” That was Turnbull’s political argument, not a legal finding. The prosecution outcome and the classification decision narrowed particular official questions; they did not erase the ethical disagreement.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
What did Henson and a former model say later?
In a 2017 ABC 7.30 interview, Henson described the images as constructions shaped by imagination and feeling: “It is not reality: it is a complete construction.” He also said the 2008 experience “only strengthened and sharpened previously held convictions.” His remarks explain his artistic position; they do not resolve how every viewer should interpret the photographs.
Rank #3
Alice Heyward, a former Henson model, said she had given informed consent and defended the artistic proposal. “I was under 18 and I gave informed consent,” she said. Her account concerns her own experience and should not be generalized to other models or used to assume that every person involved had the same circumstances. ABC’s 2017 interview with Henson and Heyward revisited both perspectives.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Rank #4
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
