The Complete Story Behind the Invention and History of the Printing Press

ThatPainter is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Learn More

The short answer: the printing press was not invented in one place by one person. China developed large-scale woodblock printing centuries before Gutenberg, and Korea developed movable metal type before the Gutenberg Bible. Gutenberg’s mid-fifteenth-century Mainz workshop created a particularly effective European system by combining reusable metal type, repeatable casting, oil-based ink, a screw-press mechanism, paper, skilled labor, and commercial finance. That system transformed the reproduction of books and images, then evolved into steam presses, rotary newspapers, lithography, offset printing, and today’s digital workflows.

Printing was not invented once

The printing press has no single inventor and no single origin. Long before Johannes Gutenberg’s workshop in Mainz, Chinese printers used carved woodblocks to reproduce texts and images, and Korean printers developed movable metal type. Gutenberg’s achievement, beginning in the mid-fifteenth century, was to integrate reusable metal letters, a repeatable casting process, oil-based ink, paper, skilled labor, finance, and a screw-driven press into a commercially powerful European system.

#	Preview	Product	Price
1		Printing Press Agent of Change	$39.69	Buy on Amazon
2		Printing presses: history and development from the fifteenth century to modern times	$70.99	Buy on Amazon
3		Johann Gutenburg and the Printing Press (Inventions and Discovery series)	$8.99	Buy on Amazon
4		The Gutenberg Revolution: How Printing Changed the Course of History	$19.38	Buy on Amazon
5		VEVOR Manual Paper Press Machine, 12x8.6 inch for A4 Sized Papers Flatting Machine, 10cm Thickness...	$72.99	Buy on Amazon

That distinction matters. Gutenberg did not invent printing, movable type, paper, or ink in a global sense. He helped create the first commercially transformative European system for producing long texts in large, relatively uniform editions. From that system grew the age of the printed book, the rapid circulation of images and arguments, mass newspapers, modern publishing, commercial advertising, and eventually digital print-on-demand.

For painters and printmakers, the history is also a history of image transfer. A printing press is a device for applying pressure so that ink moves from a prepared surface to paper or another material. The prepared surface might be a carved woodblock, raised metal type, an etched plate, a lithographic stone, a stereotype plate, or a modern digital imaging system. The machine and the image-making process are related, but they are not identical.

#1 Best Overall

Sale

Printing Press Agent of Change

• Used Book in Good Condition

$39.69

Buy on Amazon

A brief timeline of the printing press

Before Gutenberg: China and Korea

Woodblock printing turns a page into a reusable image

The essential prehistory of the printing press begins in East Asia. Chinese printers were using woodblocks to reproduce texts by the Tang period. UNESCO identifies the development of woodblock printing in China as occurring approximately between 712 and 756 CE.

The principle was straightforward but labor-intensive. A craftsman carved the text or image in relief into a wooden block. Ink was applied to the raised surface, and pressure transferred the design to paper. One block could produce many impressions, making the process highly effective when a large number of copies of the same page was required.

Its limitation was equally clear: changing the page meant carving another block. A correction, a new edition, or a different text could require substantial new labor. Woodblock printing was therefore not a primitive failure waiting for Gutenberg to fix it. It was a highly capable technology for stable texts, images, religious works, government documents, and projects in which the same page would be printed many times.

Korea developed exceptional woodblock-printing expertise. The Pure Light Dharani-sutra, associated with approximately 751 CE and the Silla dynasty, is commonly described as one of the oldest surviving woodblock prints. The tradition reached an extraordinary scale in the Tripitaka Koreana, a Buddhist canon represented by more than 80,000 surviving woodblocks.

Movable type solves a different problem

Movable type changed the unit of production. Instead of carving an entire page, a printer could create individual characters, arrange them into lines, print a page, then disassemble the form and reuse the pieces for another page.

Korea had produced books with movable metal type by approximately 1234, more than two centuries before Gutenberg’s Bible. The Korean Jikji, printed in 1377, is recognized by UNESCO as the oldest surviving book printed with movable metal type. It was produced in East Asia and is not evidence of Gutenberg’s European press system; it is evidence that movable metal type had an earlier and independent history.

The contrast between East Asian and European printing should be made carefully. Chinese and Korean writing systems required printers to manage very large inventories of characters. European alphabetic writing used a much smaller set of recurring letters, which helped make reusable type economically attractive in fifteenth-century Europe. That difference does not establish a hierarchy of technological advancement. Writing systems, institutions, markets, materials, labor, and cultural preferences all shaped which printing methods were practical.

What Gutenberg actually changed

Johannes Gutenberg was born around 1400 and died around 1468, but much of his life remains uncertain. He was associated with Strasbourg before returning to Mainz. The surviving record does not give historians a complete workshop manual or a fully documented sequence of his experiments.

The strongest documentary evidence includes the Helmasperger Notarial Instrument of November 6, 1455. It connects Gutenberg with a book-production enterprise and a financial dispute involving Johann Fust. The document does not explain every technical detail, but it confirms that Gutenberg was involved in a substantial commercial undertaking at precisely the moment when European printing was becoming visible.

Gutenberg’s breakthrough was a system rather than a single machine. It depended on several parts working together:

• Punches: hard tools used to make a precise letterform.
• Matrices: impressions made from the punches that served as molds for repeatable type.
• Type casting: a method for producing many similar letters with consistent proportions.
• Composition: the skilled arrangement of individual letters into words, lines, and pages.
• The forme: a locked-up frame holding composed type in position.
• Ink: a formulation that adhered effectively to metal type and transferred clearly to paper.
• Pressure: a press mechanism capable of applying reasonably even force across the forme.
• Materials and labor: paper or vellum, type founders, compositors, pressmen, rubricators, illuminators, binders, booksellers, and financiers.

The press itself probably adapted a screw mechanism familiar from wine, oil, and papermaking presses. The historical achievement was not simply placing letters under a screw. It was integrating type production, page design, inking, pressing, drying, correction, finishing, and distribution into a workflow that could be repeated at commercial scale.

This is why calling Gutenberg the inventor of printing is too broad. A more accurate description is that he is generally credited with developing the first commercially transformative European movable-metal-type system.

The Gutenberg Bible and the proof of the system

The famous Gutenberg Bible, also called the 42-line Bible, was printed in Mainz around 1454–1455. The Library of Congress states that printing was probably completed late in 1455. It was the first great book printed in Western Europe from movable metal type, but it was not the first printed book anywhere in the world.

Its scale demonstrates what Gutenberg’s integrated method could accomplish. The Library of Congress describes a possible print run of up to roughly 180 copies, some printed on vellum and others on paper. That was an enormous project: it required a large supply of writing material, repeated composition and presswork, proofreading, drying, sorting, and binding.

Rank #2

Printing presses: history and development from the fifteenth century to modern times

$70.99

Buy on Amazon

The Bible also shows why the earliest printed books were not completely mechanical objects. Many copies received handwritten initials, headings, rubrication, illumination, and binding after they left the press. Different artisans finished different copies, so surviving Bibles are not perfectly identical. Print reduced the need to rewrite every page, but it did not instantly eliminate manuscript craftsmanship.

Nor did printing guarantee a perfect text. Printers made errors, introduced editorial decisions, and sometimes altered or unauthorized material. The printed edition became more reproducible, not infallible.

Debt, litigation, and the Mainz Psalter

Gutenberg’s commercial position was precarious. Johann Fust financed the enterprise, and Peter Schoeffer, a trained copyist and later printer, was closely involved. In 1455, a legal dispute resulted in Fust obtaining control of important workshop assets. Fust and Schoeffer then continued printing.

Their 1457 Mainz Psalter is a landmark in early European printing. It is often described as the first completely printed book and the first major multicolored printed work, although bibliographical terminology varies. Its initials and other visual elements show that early printers were already thinking beyond plain black text. Type, color, ornament, and page architecture were becoming parts of a designed printed object.

For artists, the Psalter is a useful reminder that the press was never only a text machine. It was also a system for organizing visual hierarchy: large initials, contrasting colors, repeated motifs, margins, illustrations, and the relationship between image and language.

Why the European press spread so quickly

Printing moved from Mainz to other European cities in less than fifty years. That speed was not caused by the press alone. It depended on a network of people and institutions:

• printers and type founders who carried technical knowledge;
• paper suppliers and other material trades;
• booksellers and distributors who found customers;
• universities and schools that created demand for texts;
• churches and religious communities that commissioned books;
• scholars, translators, and editors who prepared manuscripts for publication;
• governments that required administrative documents and also attempted to regulate presses; and
• urban commercial networks capable of financing risky print runs.

Several conditions reinforced one another. Demand for religious and educational texts was rising. Universities and professional groups needed books. Paper was increasingly available. Urban markets connected printers to readers. Alphabetic European scripts could be represented with a relatively small inventory of reusable letters.

Printing was not automatically cheap or democratic. Early books required capital, specialized labor, and distribution. Many were still expensive luxury goods. The crucial economic change was that a printer could produce a run of copies without having a scribe rewrite every complete book.

Incunabula: the first century of European print

Books printed before 1501 are known as incunabula, a term associated with the infancy of European printing. Early printers initially imitated manuscripts because readers already understood their appearance. Blackletter type, decorated initials, rubrication, and familiar page layouts helped printed books look authoritative and recognizable.

Over time, print developed its own conventions. Title pages became more common. Pagination, economical formats, clearer divisions, and recognizable type styles made books easier to identify and use. The transition was gradual: manuscript culture and print culture overlapped for generations.

William Caxton illustrates how much more was involved than operating a press. After gaining experience on the Continent, he established the first printing press in England in the 1470s. University Press scholarship identifies his 1473 printing of Recuyell of the Historyes of Troye as the first book printed in English territory. Caxton was not merely a printer; he was also a translator, publisher, bookseller, and market-maker. His career shows that publishing and retail organization were as important as mechanical equipment.

How print changed the life of a text

A manuscript copy was usually unique and could contain local variations or copying mistakes. A printed edition made it possible for readers in different places to consult substantially similar pages. Scholars could compare copies, identify errors, debate editorial choices, and refer to a particular edition or page.

This did not create perfect textual stability. Printers introduced their own mistakes, and editions could differ. But it created a new culture of proofreading, correction, standardization, attribution, and bibliography. The text became a reproducible object that could be examined across distance.

The same principle applied to images. Woodcuts could be printed alongside type, allowing devotional images, maps, playing cards, broadsides, artistic prints, and diagrams to circulate. The Metropolitan Museum of Art emphasizes the role of print in disseminating classical texts, humanist writings, music, maps, and images during the Renaissance.

Rank #3

Johann Gutenburg and the Printing Press (Inventions and Discovery series)

$8.99

Buy on Amazon

For painters, this was a major shift in the life of an image. A composition no longer had to remain attached to one painting, wall, manuscript, or workshop. A printed image could travel, be collected, copied, adapted, sold, and used as a reference. Reproduction did not replace the original, but it changed how visual ideas moved between artists and audiences.

Religion, politics, and the Reformation

Printing did not cause the Reformation by itself. Religious conflict also depended on theology, institutions, rulers, economics, and long-standing criticism. Printing made those conflicts faster, broader, and more durable.

Sermons, pamphlets, catechisms, vernacular Bibles, polemics, and official responses could be issued in multiple editions and carried across political borders. Reformers could reach readers beyond the immediate audience of a sermon, but opponents could use the same machinery to publish rebuttals and defend established authority.

The press therefore had a double political character. It could support criticism and dissent, while also amplifying official propaganda, state religion, commercial advertising, and misinformation. Governments and churches tried to license, censor, regulate, or monopolize presses. Control over printers, booksellers, paper supplies, and distribution could matter as much as control over the physical press.

This pattern has continued throughout print history: the technology expands the possible audience, but institutions still influence who owns the equipment, who controls distribution, what may legally be printed, and whose version of events reaches readers.

Science, education, and shared knowledge

Printed books helped stabilize diagrams, tables, maps, mathematical notation, musical scores, and technical instructions. When scholars in different places could consult comparable editions, they had a more reliable basis for agreement and disagreement.

Printing did not eliminate error or dispute. It gave disputes a shared documentary object: a named edition, page, diagram, or proposition that could be quoted and criticized. Textbooks, reference works, newspapers, pamphlets, and specialized scientific publications gradually expanded the range of material available to readers.

The effect was cumulative. Readers became accustomed to consulting printed authorities. Publishers developed recognizable markets. Universities, churches, governments, and learned societies used print to preserve and distribute knowledge. Printing strengthened institutions that depended on standardized documents, even while it enabled people to challenge those institutions.

The hand-press era: three centuries of refinement

For roughly three centuries after Gutenberg, the basic hand-press principle changed relatively little. A workshop composed type, locked it into a forme, inked it, placed paper over it, applied pressure, removed the sheet, and repeated the cycle. Compositors assembled pages by hand, and press workers fed sheets one at a time.

That apparent stability should not be mistaken for stagnation. Printers refined type design, press construction, paper, ink, workflow, and workshop organization. They developed more efficient ways to impose pages, correct forms, manage editions, and coordinate skilled workers.

Joseph Moxon’s Mechanick Exercises of 1683 became an important English-language description of printing practice. The Folger Shakespeare Library used Moxon’s later account when reconstructing a press associated with the 1623 period because direct evidence about earlier presses is incomplete. Such reconstructions are valuable for demonstrating what a historical press could do, but they cannot prove that every workshop operated in exactly the same way.

The eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries brought stronger iron presses. The Stanhope press in England and the Columbian press in the United States increased durability and pressure and reduced some of the physical strain of earlier wooden machines. The workflow remained recognizable, but the machines could produce more impressions more reliably.

Steam power and the age of the mass newspaper

The industrial phase began when printing presses were connected to mechanical power and continuous production systems. Frederick Koenig and Andreas Bauer developed a steam-powered cylinder press used by The Times of London in 1814. The Library of Congress describes that press as capable of approximately 1,100 sheets per hour, a major increase over hand-fed presses.

A cylinder press replaced the simple flat-bed-and-platen action with a rolling contact between the paper and the forme. Later rotary presses used rotating cylinders and eventually curved stereotype plates. Continuous rolls of paper, mechanical feeding, double-sided printing, and automated folding further reduced the time between composing a page and distributing a newspaper.

Rank #4

Sale

The Gutenberg Revolution: How Printing Changed the Course of History

• Used Book in Good Condition

$19.38

Buy on Amazon

By the late nineteenth century, newspaper presses could produce thousands of copies per hour. This helped create mass-circulation newspapers and cheaper daily news. In the United States, steam-powered printing contributed to the penny press and helped newspapers reach working-class readers.

Newspapers became tied to advertising, transportation networks, political campaigns, and urban consumer culture. Faster production did not simply make existing books cheaper; it created new rhythms of public life. News could be daily, later multiple editions could follow changing events, and advertisers could address large audiences in the same printed environment.

Typesetting becomes a machine problem

Press speed was only one limit. Before a page could be printed, a compositor had to assemble individual pieces of type. Hand-setting was skilled, repetitive, and slow, especially for newspapers that needed fresh pages every day.

Ottmar Mergenthaler’s Linotype, developed in Baltimore in 1886, allowed an operator to produce complete lines of type mechanically. It replaced Gutenberg-era handset composition for many newspaper and publishing operations. The change mattered because it attacked the bottleneck before the press: composing text.

Once typesetting, printing, folding, and distribution were treated as parts of one industrial system, the scale of publication could grow dramatically. The modern newspaper was the product of an entire chain, not merely a faster version of a Gutenberg press.

Lithography and the expansion of printed images

Letterpress was well suited to raised type and relief images, but the history of printing also includes processes that do not rely on raised letters. Lithography, developed in the late eighteenth century, printed from a flat, chemically treated surface. It expanded the possibilities for drawing, tonal variation, and image reproduction.

Offset lithography later developed as a rotary process. Instead of transferring the image directly from the plate to paper, the image moved first to a rubber blanket and then to the paper. This indirect transfer helped make offset useful for books, magazines, newspapers, packaging, and commercial color work.

These developments widened the press’s cultural role. Illustrated newspapers, posters, political cartoons, sheet music, catalogues, postcards, magazines, advertising, and packaging all depended on increasingly efficient combinations of image reproduction, type, paper manufacture, and distribution.

For visual artists, lithography and offset also clarified an important distinction: a printing press does not impose one artistic language. The character of the final image depends on the matrix or plate, the ink, the paper, the pressure, the surface, and the decisions made before and during the impression.

Printing in the Americas and the wider world

European printing technologies spread through colonial networks, but printing histories outside Europe should not be treated as passive extensions of Gutenberg. East Asian traditions had their own scripts, institutions, markets, materials, and technical trajectories. The European press became globally influential, but it entered societies that already had systems for recording, copying, illustrating, and circulating knowledge.

In the Americas, presses became important instruments of religious conversion, administration, education, commerce, and political debate. Access to them was often regulated by colonial authorities. In British North America, printing began in the seventeenth century and became closely associated with newspapers, pamphlets, government documents, and revolutionary politics.

The broader lesson is that a press has meaning only within a social system. Who owns it? Who is permitted to operate it? What may legally be printed? Who distributes the output? Which languages are supported? Who can afford to buy it, and who can read it? The answers shape the consequences of the technology.

The twentieth century: from metal type to electronic composition

Twentieth-century printing increasingly separated composition from the physical press. Phototypesetting replaced much hot-metal composition. Characters were arranged photographically rather than cast as individual metal sorts, and offset lithography became dominant for books, magazines, newspapers, packaging, and commercial work.

This separation made it easier to combine photography, several colors, different typefaces, and complex page layouts. It also changed the labor of publishing. The central skills moved progressively toward editing, design, image preparation, plate production, and mechanical or electronic prepress.

Best Value

Sale

VEVOR Manual Paper Press Machine, 12x8.6 inch for A4 Sized Papers Flatting Machine, 10cm Thickness Steel Frame Manual Flat Paper Press Machine, Papermaking Book Press

• Durable Material: This commercial bookbinding press is constructed with thickened steel, featuring a classic silver-grey appearance. The durable thickened steel ensures long-lasting use without deformation.
• Effective Working Area & Pressure: Our powerful paper flattener is commonly suitable for A4 sized paper. It's obvious to perceive that your documents can be flattened more efficiently by 12" x 9"/305 x 228.6 mm large working area and 5.9"/150 mm flattening thickness. With the rotary handle, elongated nut, bold screw rod, and thickened plate, the pressure can reach 3306 lbs /1500 KG.
• Stable Structure: Non-slip foot pads reduce damage on the tabletop and increase friction to make the bookbinding tool more stable. On the other hand, two balance rods and 0.3"/8 mm baseplate thickness facilitate it to bear more substantial pressure evenly.
• Easy to Operate: Easy to operate this bookbinding press machine, especially with the detachable three-side baffles. Documents can be flattened tightly against the left, right, and middle baffle, ensuring a more convenient working process.
• Essential Office Tool: Our paper press machine, as a necessary office tool for sorting out data, is perfect to press bills, ledger leveling, book files, coins, stamps, albums, papers, checks, notes, invoice, and financial receipt, etc.

$72.99

Buy on Amazon

By the late twentieth century, computers transformed composition, editing, and page design. A digital file could be corrected, transmitted, archived, and output on different devices. Digital typesetting systems such as TeX formed part of this broader transformation, while Linotype composition declined in major newspapers.

Digital printing and the changing meaning of the press

Digital printing does not use a fixed plate in the same way as traditional letterpress or offset printing. Each page can be generated from digital data, which makes variable pages, personalized materials, short runs, rapid revisions, and print-on-demand practical.

The result is not the disappearance of print but a change in the relationship between content and physical copies. A book, photograph, manual, educational resource, or newspaper may exist simultaneously as a digital file and as one or more printed objects. Print-on-demand allows small publishers, self-publishers, archives, and specialist communities to issue works without maintaining the large inventories once required.

Digital production lowers some barriers to publication, but it shifts costs rather than eliminating them. Software, design, data management, distribution, marketing, and platform visibility become more important. A person may be able to create a printable file with little equipment and still struggle to reach readers.

What the printing press changed—and what it did not

The press increased the speed and scale of reproduction. It helped create larger reading publics, strengthened institutions that depended on standardized documents, and made books, images, arguments, instructions, and records easier to circulate.

It did not automatically create universal literacy, free expression, or equal access to knowledge. Books remained expensive for long periods. Literacy was shaped by class, gender, geography, language, religion, and law. Printers could reproduce falsehoods as efficiently as accurate information, and authorities could use print for censorship and propaganda as well as administration and education.

Nor did printing produce a clean break between old and new media. Manuscript decoration continued inside early printed books. Handwork remained part of finishing. Oral communication, public performance, painting, sculpture, and other forms of visual culture continued alongside print. The press changed how those media circulated and interacted; it did not simply replace them.

The most defensible conclusion is that printing changed the conditions under which knowledge, authority, memory, and controversy operated. Its consequences came from people and institutions using the technology, not from the machine in isolation.

Why the history still matters to painters and printmakers

The history of the press offers a useful way to think about reproduction in visual art. A woodblock, type form, etched plate, lithographic surface, offset plate, or digital file is a means of preserving and repeating a design. Each one changes what can be reproduced, how much labor each copy requires, and how closely copies can resemble one another.

• Woodblock printing treats the carved block as a durable image-bearing surface. It is especially powerful for bold shapes, repeated motifs, and the visible character of carved marks.
• Letterpress prints from raised surfaces. Gutenberg’s system made text economical by allowing recurring letters to be rearranged, while relief images could share the printed page.
• Lithography uses a flat chemically prepared surface and can preserve qualities closer to drawing.
• Offset printing uses an intermediate blanket and is suited to efficient, high-volume reproduction of text and images.
• Digital printing replaces a fixed reusable form with data-driven output, making short runs and variable pages practical.

None of these processes is simply an improved version of the previous one. Each solves different problems and creates different visual possibilities. That is why contemporary printmaking can use historical methods without treating them as obsolete, while commercial printers can combine digital composition with older paper, ink, and finishing practices.

Further reading and a hands-on extension

Readers who want a broader account can look for a history of print culture such as The Book in the Renaissance, which places early printing within the wider world of books, readers, and Renaissance institutions. For a focused account of the famous Bible and the human stories surrounding rare-book collecting, The Lost Gutenberg is a useful book about the Gutenberg Bible. For a global perspective that extends beyond European book production into woodblock printing, etching, and printmaking as information dissemination, The Story of Printmaking offers a global history of printmaking.

For students or families who want to experience the basic principle rather than recreate Gutenberg’s technology, a beginner relief-printing kit can demonstrate how ink transfers from a prepared raised surface to paper. Such a kit is an educational extension, not a historical equivalent to a fifteenth-century press.

The chronology and historical distinctions in this article draw on documentation from UNESCO, the Library of Congress, the Folger Shakespeare Library, the Metropolitan Museum of Art, University Press scholarship, and the American Printing History Association, as represented in the research for this article.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did Gutenberg invent the printing press?

No. Chinese printers used woodblocks centuries before Gutenberg, and Korea produced books with movable metal type by about 1234. Gutenberg is best understood as the developer of a commercially transformative European movable-metal-type system, not the global inventor of printing.

What was the first book printed with movable metal type?

The Korean Jikji, printed in 1377, is recognized as the oldest surviving book printed with movable metal type. The Gutenberg Bible, printed around 1454–1455, was the first great book produced in Western Europe with movable metal type, but it was not the first printed book in the world.

How did Gutenberg’s printing system work?

Gutenberg’s system combined repeatable metal type made from punches and matrices, a composing process, ink suited to metal type, a screw-driven press, paper or vellum, and the labor and finance required to produce and distribute books. The importance lay in the integrated workflow, not just the screw press.

Is a printing press the same thing as printmaking?

A printing press applies pressure to transfer ink from a prepared surface to paper. Letterpress uses raised type or relief surfaces, while lithography and offset use flat chemically treated surfaces. Digital printing generates each page from digital data rather than relying on one fixed plate.

The Bottom Line

Bottom line: Gutenberg did not invent printing from nothing. Chinese woodblock printers and Korean movable-type printers established crucial precedents; Gutenberg’s lasting achievement was integrating reusable metal type, casting, ink, pressing, materials, labor, and finance into a commercially powerful European system. Its later history is the story of that system becoming an industry—and of society continually deciding who could use it, what it would reproduce, and who would be able to see it.

Quick Recap

SaleBestseller No. 1

Printing Press Agent of Change

Used Book in Good Condition

$39.69

Bestseller No. 2

Printing presses: history and development from the fifteenth century to modern times

$70.99

Bestseller No. 3

Johann Gutenburg and the Printing Press (Inventions and Discovery series)

$8.99

SaleBestseller No. 4

The Gutenberg Revolution: How Printing Changed the Course of History

Used Book in Good Condition

$19.38

SaleBestseller No. 5

VEVOR Manual Paper Press Machine, 12x8.6 inch for A4 Sized Papers Flatting Machine, 10cm Thickness Steel Frame Manual Flat Paper Press Machine, Papermaking Book Press

$72.99

ThatPainter Team