Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.
Scan My Drivers Free →Free scan · exact hardware match
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
ThatPainter is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Learn More
“John James Audubon was never good” is a moral judgment, not a settled historical fact. The record does show that the celebrated bird artist enslaved people, bought and sold enslaved people during his business years, opposed emancipation, and held racist views. It also shows that his art and observations made a substantial contribution to bird study and printmaking. Neither achievement cancels the harm, nor does the harm make every image or observation fraudulent.
#1 Best Overall
Why Audubon’s bird art mattered
The Birds of America
Published between 1827 and 1838, The Birds of America brought together 435 engraved images depicting about 490 bird species at life size, according to Audubon magazine’s 2020 account. The scale and ambition of the project helped make it a landmark of bird illustration. The Natural History Museum describes the book as a major achievement in both bird study and printmaking, noting its realistic perspectives and backgrounds. It reports that 119 copies are known to survive.
Observation, influence, and limits
Audubon studied birds in the wild and made ecological observations from that work. The American Philosophical Society credits him with identifying 25 species new to scientists of European descent. That qualification matters: the Society cautions that Indigenous people may already have known many of those birds. Audubon also drew on earlier naturalists, including Mark Catesby, so his compositions belong to a broader history of observation and image-making rather than standing apart from it.
His achievement was consequential, but it was not a solitary one. Black and Indigenous people helped him collect specimens and shared local knowledge that he sometimes incorporated into his writing. Historian Gregory Nobles put the contradiction plainly in Audubon magazine: “Even though Audubon found Black and Indigenous people scientifically useful, he never accepted them as socially or racially equal.”
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
What the record says about enslavement and racism
Audubon enslaved people, bought and sold enslaved people during his business years, and wrote critically about emancipation. These are documented parts of his biography, not incidental details to be set aside when considering the art. Enslavement was embedded in the society in which he worked, and his own participation in it is part of the context for his life and career.
Rank #3
The American Philosophical Society places his work within the histories of plantation slavery and Indigenous dispossession, and characterizes him as a participant in scientific racism. Its exhibition states: “Audubon supported these policies both as an enslaver and as a participant in scientific racism.” His use of Black and Indigenous people’s labor and knowledge alongside his refusal to regard them as equals exposes a sharp gap between the information he valued and the people who provided it.
Was Audubon’s science fraudulent?
Some of Audubon’s claims deserve skepticism, but the evidence does not support treating his entire body of work as a fraud. The American Philosophical Society recounts that naturalist George Ord identified one of Audubon’s purported new species as fake. Separately, the Natural History Museum says there is no concrete evidence that the “Bird of Washington,” an eagle Audubon presented as a new discovery, existed. Those are specific problems with particular claims; they do not establish that all of his observations or illustrations were fabricated.
Rank #4
- Dover publications-Audubon's birds of America coloring
- This item Belongs to painting and drawing, drawing-pads-and-books
- This item is manufactured in United States
Questions also surround Audubon’s autobiographical stories about his frontier life and his account of his origins. The Natural History Museum reports that some stories have been debated and that accounts of his origins are unreliable. Sources disagree about his mother’s identity and racial background. That uncertainty should remain uncertainty: conjecture about ancestry is not a sound basis for presenting a definitive claim.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →How institutions frame his legacy today
The National Audubon Society, founded in 1905—50 years after Audubon’s death—reviewed whether to retain its name. Its FAQ says the organization chose to keep it after a process lasting more than 12 months and involving more than 2,300 people, including more than 1,700 internal respondents and more than 600 external individuals. The Society acknowledges his enslavement and racist attitudes while emphasizing its conservation mission and inclusion commitments.
Keeping the name does not itself demonstrate approval of Audubon’s conduct; the organization describes its reasons as a decision about its present-day mission and identity. The American Philosophical Society instead foregrounds how science has participated in injustice. These institutional approaches show that his legacy is actively interpreted, not that there is a universal moral consensus on what his name should mean. The available accounts also do not establish the naming decisions of every local Audubon organization.
How to hold the achievement and the harm together
A fair account need not choose between admiring the craft of Audubon’s bird images and confronting the conditions and beliefs bound up with his career. His prints remain important works of art and natural history; his enslavement, racism, unequal treatment of collaborators, and unreliable claims remain part of the same history. Calling him simply “good” risks turning achievement into absolution. Calling every part of his work worthless goes beyond what the evidence establishes.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →
